SFT 645 – Safety Engineering
& Equipment Design
Department
of Safety Technology
Semester & Year: Spring, 2005
Classroom Location:
Monday
Evening:
Required Text:
29CFR 1910 OSHA General Industry
Regulations (Updated thru
ISBN
1-932249-08-7 Phone 563/323-6245 or 800/767-3759 www.mancomm.com
Computer Requirements: Ability to utilize the Internet, PowerPoint
and word processing software.
Instructor: Clair Roudebush PhD
CSP
212 Communications Building
Personal Office Phone: (304) 696-3068
Departmental Office Phone: (304) 696-4664
Departmental Fax: (304) 696-3070
Email: ROUDEBUSH@MARSHALL.EDU
Course Description: The design and engineering of facilities and
equipment to meet the physical needs of the human as well as enhancing
production.
Course Outcome Assessment: This assessment is
based upon an analysis of classroom assignments, out-of-class assignments,
examination questions, written reports, and PowerPoint presentations. The
performance criterion for all outcomes is based on the class average scores for
the course activity. Performance is deemed acceptable at an average score of
70% or above. If class average scores are between 50% and 70% then there is
course outcome concern. If class average score below 50% then course outcome is
considered a weakness.
CO-1: The student will be able to successfully complete
two (2) competency examinations encompassing safety engineering terms and
regulatory standards.
CO-2: The student will be able to successfully complete
one (1) timed competency examination testing their ability to identity and
discern OSHA regulatory standard for specific industrial hazards.
CO-3: The student will be able to successfully
complete a competency mathematical examination testing their ability to apply trigonometry
and algebraic formulas to solving of safety engineering problem sets.
CO-4: The student will be able to successfully
apply safety engineering principles to the evaluation of a specific machine
guarding situation.
CO-5: The
student will be able to utilize problem solving skills to propose a solution to
the specific machine guarding problem that meet all regulatory standards and
safety engineering principles.
CO-6: The student will be able to develop a
PowerPoint presentation which meets the organization criteria described in the
Course Activities Section of this syllabus.
Adaptive Methods for Disabilities: Students with
disabilities who believe that they may need accommodations in this class are
encouraged to contact Dr. Roudebush as soon as possible to better ensure that
such accommodations are implemented in a timely fashion. A reasonable period of
time must be given to Dr. Roudebush when making your initial request for any
accommodation.
Course
Activities:
Interim Examinations
– There will be two (2) to three (3) interim exams throughout the semester.
Make-up exams will only be given under extreme cases as determined by
instructor. Make-up exams may or may not be of the same proportioned variety.
Machine Safeguarding Report
- This course activity entails analyzing a machine safeguarding scenario and
developing a technical report of your findings. Late assignments will incur a 5% penalty per
day (including weekends)
Machine Safeguarding Oral
PowerPoint Presentation - This course activity entails orally presenting your machine
safeguarding scenario findings to the class in the form of a PowerPoint
presentation. Oral presentations will be
evaluated using the categorical criteria listed below. Late assignments will
incur a 5% penalty per day (including weekends)
Oral Presentation
Evaluation Criteria:
|
Category |
Low
Criteria |
Evaluation |
High
Criteria |
|
PowerPoint Outline |
- Minimal Info Provided |
10
11 12 13
14 15 16
17 18 19
20 |
Extensive Info Provided |
|
Introduction |
- Nothing Given |
5
5.5 6 6.5
7 7.5 8
8.5 9 9.5
10 |
Subject Stated Scope & Goal Stated |
|
Delivery Technique |
-No Eye Contact - Distracting Body Moves |
5
5.5 6 6.5
7 7.5 8
8.5 9 9.5
10 |
Good Eye Contact Audible Voice Humor |
|
Organization |
- Confusion |
10
11 12 13
14 15 16
17 18 19
20 |
On Subject |
|
Knowledge of Subject |
- Reading Notes |
5 5.5 6
6.5 7 7.5
8 8.5 9
9.5 10 |
No Notes Used |
|
PowerPoint Visual Aids |
None Used |
10
11 12 13
14 15 16
17 18 19
20 |
Effectively Utilized |
|
TIme |
Over/Under |
5
5.5 6 6.5
7 7.5 8
8.5 9 9.5
10 |
Within Time Limits |
In-class
Exercises, Out-of-class Activities & Class Participation – The criteria
used to evaluate this student activity includes:
·
completion
of in-class and out-of-class assignments in a timely fashion
·
student’s
contribution to classroom discussions throughout the semester
·
student’s
ability to raise relevant topical questions.
Evaluation / Grade Computation: Course grades are
based on “weighted” percentage averages. Your final grade will be derived by
multiplying each individual Student Activity score by the weighted percentage
and summing all of the weighted percentage averages. All late
assignments will incur a 5% penalty per day (including weekends & holidays)
|
Student
Activity |
Individual Score |
Weighted
% |
Weighted
% Average |
|
Interim Exams |
|
x 0.40 |
|
|
Machine Safeguarding Report |
|
x 0.20 |
|
|
Machine Safeguarding Oral PowerPoint
Presentation |
|
x 0.15 |
|
|
In-class exercises, Out-of-class activities
& Class Participation |
|
x 0.25 |
|
|
Grand Total = |
|
||
|
Evaluation
Scale |
||||
|
90% & Above =A |
80% - 89% = B |
70% - 79% = C |
60% - 69% = D |
59% & Below = F |
Bibliography
Abercrombie, S.
A. 1981.
Dictionary of terms used in the
safety profession.
Colangelo, V. J. and
Thornton, P. A. 1981. Engineering
aspects of product liability.
Confer, R. and Conver,
T. 1994.
Occupational health and
safety: Terms,
definitions,
and appreviations.
DeReamer, R. 1980. Modern safety and health technology.
Ferry, T. 1990. Safety and health management planning.
Ferry, T. S. 1988. Modern accident investigation and analysis (2nd
ed.).
Goetsch, D. L. 1993. Industrial safety and health: In the age of high technology.
Grimaldi, J. V. and
Simonds, R. H. 1989. Safety
management.
Hale, A. R., and
Glendon, A. I 1987. Individual behavior in the control of danger.
Hammer, W. 1972. Handbook of system and product safety.
Heinrich, H. W.,
Petersen, D., and Roos, N. 1980. Industrial
accident prevention.
Kuhlmann, R. L. 1977. Professional accident investigation: Investigative methods and techniques.
Malasky, S. W. 1982. System safety: Technology and application. 2nd ed.
Mansdorf, S. Z. 1993. Complete manual of industrial safety.
OSHA Training
Institute. 1994. A guide
to voluntary compliance in safety and health.
Occupational Safety
and Health Administration. 2001. Code of
federal regulations, title 29 sections 1910.134, 1910.1000, 1910.1200.
Roland, H. E., and
Moriarty, B. 1990. System
safety engineering and management (2nd ed.).
Seiden, R. M. 1984. Product safety engineering for
managers: A practical handbook and
guide.
United States
Department of Labor, 1991. All
about OSHA.
United States
Department of Labor. 1990a. OSHA
compliance manual: What is OSHA.
United States
Department of Labor. 1990c. OSHA
compliance manual: Inspections.
Internet Web Sites
Occupational Safety
& Health
Administration -
US Centers for Disease
Control http://www/cdc.gov
US Dept. of Health and
Human Services http://www.os.dhhs.gov
US National Institutes
of Health http://www.nih.gov/
US National Library of
Medicine http://www.nim.nih.gov/
World Health
Organization http://www.who.ch