Goal 5: Outreach
[INSERT TEMPLATE BOX HERE; repeat procedure for every objective, answer questions]
|
Objective |
1. The One Room School 2000 project will build a desktop video telecommunications network that uses scalable and sustainable technology to support the delivery of live and stored video courses to key receive sites. |
||||||
|
Current Capabilities |
1 - Not at All |
2 - Slight |
3 - Somewhat |
4 - Fairly High |
5 - Very High |
||
|
Desired Capabilities |
1 - Not at All |
2 - Slight |
3 - Somewhat |
4 - Fairly High |
5 - Very High |
||
|
Plan to reconcile the difference between current and desired capabilities |
Develop and deploy IPTV server and clients as well as an archive of stored video course offerings to remote sites. |
||||||
|
Measurable/observable initial, intermediate, and long terms student outcomes |
Increased, quality stored video course offerings and increased student enrollment in such courses. |
||||||
|
Necessary skills and knowledge |
Technical support staff knowledgeable in developing and deploying the technology as well as sufficient knowledge and competence among faculty to develop appropriate course material. |
||||||
|
Processes that need to be in place |
|
||||||
|
Professional development plans |
|
||||||
|
Hardware Requirements |
IPTV server, routers which support multicast, broadband data connectivity. |
||||||
|
Software Requirements |
IPTV server and client licenses. |
||||||
|
Evaluation Measures |
Flashlight Proejct. |
||||||
|
Timeline |
1998-1999 |
1999-2000 |
2000-2001 |
||||
|
Objective |
2. An assessment of a proposed joint-use facility will be conducted prior to signing an agreement for use in the delivery of courses via live video transmissions and online courses. As well, a post-evaluation of the facility will occur prior to renewing an agreement. |
||||||
|
Current Capabilities |
1 - Not at All |
2 - Slight |
3 - Somewhat |
4 - Fairly High |
5 - Very High |
||
|
Desired Capabilities |
1 - Not at All |
2 - Slight |
3 - Somewhat |
4 - Fairly High |
5 - Very High |
||
|
Plan to reconcile the difference between current and desired capabilities |
Strict enforcement of assessing non-MU facilities; cost of compliance for a suitable facility and responsible party is a crucial part of any agreement, along with appropriate technical support. |
||||||
|
Measurable/observable initial, intermediate, and long terms student outcomes |
Properly designed joint-use facilities will result in a higher quality delivery system, better product, and greater student & faculty satisfaction. |
||||||
|
Necessary skills and knowledge |
Knowledge of MU’s technical capabilities; user goals; negotiating skills. |
||||||
|
Processes that need to be in place |
Clear system of accountability – who is authorized to negotiate joint-use facility agreements; involvement of appropriate staff. |
||||||
|
Professional development plans |
Faculty must demonstrate appropriate skill level when using technology. |
||||||
|
Hardware Requirements |
Variable; must be compatible with existing MU specifications. |
||||||
|
Software Requirements |
Ensure that MU technical staff can support the approved software. |
||||||
|
Evaluation Measures |
Flashlight project. |
||||||
|
Timeline |
1998-1999 |
1999-2000 |
2000-2001 |
||||
|
Objective |
3. Marshall University academic programs will be analyzed by the respective dean, according to targeted students and program objectives for the purpose of determining appropriate technology-based delivery strategies. |
||||||
|
Current Capabilities |
1 - Not at All |
2 - Slight |
3 - Somewhat |
4 - Fairly High |
5 - Very High |
||
|
Desired Capabilities |
1 - Not at All |
2 - Slight |
3 - Somewhat |
4 - Fairly High |
5 - Very High |
||
|
Plan to reconcile the difference between current and desired capabilities |
Ask the Provost, in conjunction with the dean, to appoint a task force for each college to conduct a formal program assessment. At least one member should be from outside the college and who possesses appropriate assessment skills. |
||||||
|
Measurable/observable initial, intermediate, and long terms student outcomes |
A broader range of programs, delivered by appropriate technology, should be available to students. It could lead to time-shortened degree completion. |
||||||
|
Necessary skills and knowledge |
An understanding of each college’s programs of study and the suitability of technology to deliver all or part of a program. |
||||||
|
Processes that need to be in place |
A college-based Program Assessment Committee, start and end date, clear date for final report; follow-up action; allocation of funds. |
||||||
|
Professional development plans |
If appropriate to further train faculty in the use of technology; workshop to revise curriculum when adapting for non-traditional delivery system. |
||||||
|
Hardware Requirements |
Will vary depending on college’s needs. |
||||||
|
Software Requirements |
Compliance with MU specifications. |
||||||
|
Evaluation Measures |
Compliance with MU specifications. |
||||||
|
Timeline |
1998-1999 |
1999-2000 |
2000-2001 |
||||
|
Objective |
4. For each program that utilizes technology-based delivery systems, College-based Instructional Technologists will create development teams, that will include support staff, to assist faculty in creating and implementing computer, video, audio, or integrated media instructional applications. |
||||||
|
Current Capabilities |
1 - Not at All |
2 - Slight |
3 - Somewhat |
4 - Fairly High |
5 - Very High |
||
|
Desired Capabilities |
1 - Not at All |
2 - Slight |
3 - Somewhat |
4 - Fairly High |
5 - Very High |
||
|
Plan to reconcile the difference between current and desired capabilities |
Make college-based IT staff accountable to Director of Center for Instructional Technology. Identify and establish a master list of faculty and staff willing to serve in development teams to assist other faculty in the application of technology. |
||||||
|
Measurable/observable initial, intermediate, and long terms student outcomes |
A more proficient faculty in the understanding and use of technology will result in a better course product which should lead to a more satisfied student customer. |
||||||
|
Necessary skills and knowledge |
Assessment skills; in-depth knowledge of technology to be able to serve as faculty mentors. |
||||||
|
Processes that need to be in place |
A process managed by the Director of the Center for Instructional Technology to recruit, train and maintain members of the development teams. |
||||||
|
Professional development plans |
Technical training as identified and needed. |
||||||
|
Hardware Requirements |
Compatible with MU specifications. |
||||||
|
Software Requirements |
Compliance with MU specifications. |
||||||
|
Evaluation Measures |
Flashlight Project. |
||||||
|
Timeline |
1998-1999 |
1999-2000 |
2000-2001 |
||||
|
Objective |
5. The Center for Instructional Technology will be expanded as a university-wide faculty development center and will continue to support and provide access to the hardware, software and networking necessary for creating computer, video, audio and integrated media instructional applications. |
||||||
|
Current Capabilities |
1 - Not at All |
2 - Slight |
3 – Somewhat |
4 - Fairly High |
5 - Very High |
||
|
Desired Capabilities |
1 - Not at All |
2 - Slight |
3 - Somewhat |
4 - Fairly High |
5 – Very High |
||
|
Plan to reconcile the difference between current and desired capabilities |
|
||||||
|
Measurable/observable initial, intermediate, and long terms student outcomes |
|
||||||
|
Necessary skills and knowledge |
|
||||||
|
Processes that need to be in place |
|
||||||
|
Professional development plans |
|
||||||
|
Hardware Requirements |
1. Upgrade current equipment as needed. |
||||||
|
Software Requirements |
|
||||||
|
Evaluation Measures |
|
||||||
|
Timeline |
1998-1999 |
1999-2000 |
2000-2001 |
||||
|
Objective |
6. Online course offerings will continue to expand, depending on availability of funds, and improve in the quality and required resources. Additional courses will be added to the Southern Regional Electronic Campus catalog. |
||||||
|
Current Capabilities |
1 - Not at All |
2 - Slight |
3 - Somewhat |
4 - Fairly High |
5 - Very High |
||
|
Desired Capabilities |
1 - Not at All |
2 - Slight |
3 - Somewhat |
4 - Fairly High |
5 - Very High |
||
|
Plan to reconcile the difference between current and desired capabilities |
Increase the per-credit hour development payment for faculty from $1,000 to $1,500. Provide more support to faculty to revise existing and develop additional online courses. |
||||||
|
Measurable/observable initial, intermediate, and long terms student outcomes |
More online courses will increase access for students, both on campus and those at remote sites. It will also make more courses available to XXX, expanding MU’s student base. |
||||||
|
Necessary skills and knowledge |
Refinement of existing skills; knowledge of new applications will be essential. |
||||||
|
Processes that need to be in place |
Implementation of college development teams as referenced in objective 3. |
||||||
|
Professional development plans |
Additional workshops offered by the Center for Instructional Technology as well as sending faculty and staff to off-campus sites. |
||||||
|
Hardware Requirements |
Additional laptops for faculty (amount will vary). |
||||||
|
Software Requirements |
It will depend on course and instructor; technical support provided only to approved software. |
||||||
|
Evaluation Measures |
Flashlight Project. |
||||||
|
Timeline |
1998-1999 |
1999-2000 |
2000-2001 |
||||
|
Objective |
7. Additional university classrooms will be designed to allow for the origination and off-campus distribution of live and stored video classroom instruction, depending on available funding. |
||||||
|
Current Capabilities |
1 - Not at All |
2 - Slight |
3 - Somewhat |
4 - Fairly High |
5 - Very High |
||
|
Desired Capabilities |
1 - Not at All |
2 - Slight |
3 - Somewhat |
4 - Fairly High |
5 – Very High |
||
|
Plan to reconcile the difference between current and desired capabilities |
Additional classrooms for the origination of live and stored video instruction will be built as needs and funding are determined. Campus MCU and associated hardware will be expanded to accommodate simultaneous facility usage as needed. |
||||||
|
Measurable/observable initial, intermediate, and long terms student outcomes |
More distance learning courses will increase opportunities for off-campus students, improving quality of educational experience for students and attracting an increased student base. |
||||||
|
Necessary skills and knowledge |
Ability to design, implement and support sophisticated distance learning and video conferencing technologies. Ability for faculty to use this sophisticated technology. |
||||||
|
Processes that need to be in place |
Processes to prioritize and schedule classroom usage. Processes to enroll and support distance learning students. Processes to support faculty in the development and delivery of distance learning courses. |
||||||
|
Professional development plans |
Continued training and professional development of technical support staff and faculty. |
||||||
|
Hardware Requirements |
Variable: integrated multimedia and distance learning control panels and equipment. |
||||||
|
Software Requirements |
Variable: presentation software |
||||||
|
Evaluation Measures |
Flashlight project. |
||||||
|
Timeline |
1998-1999 |
1999-2000 |
2000-2001 |
||||
|
Objective |
8. The Flashlight Project will be used to evaluate the effectiveness of telecommunications for distance teaching and learning, such as desktop and group video conferencing, broadcast TV and cable distribution systems, videotaped courses, audio conferencing, and online courses. |
||||||
|
Current Capabilities |
1 - Not at All |
2 - Slight |
3 - Somewhat |
4 - Fairly High |
5 - Very High |
||
|
Desired Capabilities |
1 - Not at All |
2 - Slight |
3 - Somewhat |
4 - Fairly High |
5 - Very High |
||
|
Plan to reconcile the difference between current and desired capabilities |
Apply Flashlight Project Evaluation to all technology delivered courses: online, compressed video, satellite, audio, integrated media. Evaluate existing personnel responsible for Flashlight. |
||||||
|
Measurable/observable initial, intermediate, and long terms student outcomes |
Using the results of the evaluations will cause the faculty and staff to improve the technology, greatly improving the quality of the experience for students. |
||||||
|
Necessary skills and knowledge |
Faculty will need to be trained in the administration of Flashlight as well as assessing the results. May require additional XXX. |
||||||
|
Processes that need to be in place |
Process is in place – needs to be enhanced and improved upon. |
||||||
|
Professional development plans |
N/A |
||||||
|
Hardware Requirements |
None |
||||||
|
Software Requirements |
None |
||||||
|
Evaluation Measures |
N/A |
||||||
|
Timeline |
1998-1999 |
1999-2000 |
2000-2001 |
||||
|
Objective |
9. The School of Medicine will continue to develop and expand distance learning and clinical service outreach efforts in support of degree, non-degree and continuing education programs in the fields of nursing, allied health, graduate biomedical science research, forensic science and medicine. |
||||||
|
Current Capabilities |
1 - Not at All |
2 – Slight |
3 – Somewhat |
4 - Fairly High |
5 - Very High |
||
|
Desired Capabilities |
1 - Not at All |
2 - Slight |
3 - Somewhat |
4 – Fairly High |
5 - Very High |
||
|
Plan to reconcile the difference between current and desired capabilities |
|
||||||
|
Measurable/observable initial, intermediate, and long terms student outcomes |
|
||||||
|
Necessary skills and knowledge |
|
||||||
|
Processes that need to be in place |
|
||||||
|
Professional development plans |
|
||||||
|
Hardware Requirements |
|
||||||
|
Software Requirements |
|
||||||
|
Evaluation Measures |
|
||||||
|
Timeline |
1998-1999 |
1999-2000 |
2000-2001 |
||||
Goal 4: Outreach
|
Item Description |
Factor |
Amt. |
Item Cost |
Subtotal |
|
|
Unit or hour etc. |
# |
dollars |
subtotals |
|
Objective #1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Objective #2 – Joint use facility development & use agreements |
|
|
|
Will vary |
|
Objective #3 – Costs for outside assessor; new hardware & software, if needed |
|
|
|
$50,000 |
|
Objective #4 – Minimal expense |
|
|
|
$5,000 |
|
Objective #5 – Pooled instructional technologist |
Ea. Position |
1 |
$50,000 |
$50,000 |
|
Objective #5 – Hardware and software upgrades |
|
|
|
Will vary |
|
Objective #6 – Course development (1999-2000) |
Ea. Course |
50 |
$3,000 |
$150,000 |
|
Objective #6 – Course development (2000-2001) |
Ea. Course |
50 |
$4,500 |
$225,000 |
|
Objective #7 – Distance learning classrooms |
Ea. Classroom |
|
$150,000 |
|
|
Objective #8 – Flashlight Project licensing |
|
|
|
$1,800 |
|
Objective #9 – Telemedicine consultation room |
Ea. Room |
1 |
$100,000 |
$100,000 |
|
Objective #9 – Distance learning classrooms |
Ea. Classroom |
2 |
$150,000 |
$300,000 |