MARSHALL UNIVERSITY CLASSIFIED STAFF COUNCIL MINUTES  

Thursday, December 14, 2000

Big Green Room – Henderson Center

President Barrett called the meeting to order at 1:00 p.m.  Motion was made by Jill Chapman, seconded by LuAnn South, to accept November minutes as written.  Council unanimously agreed.  

Jim Stephens expressed his appreciation to Jill Chapman, our only remaining Charter Member of Staff Council who is retiring tomorrow, and wished her well in her retirement and stated he would miss her.  He presented one item to Council:  Draft of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) – a mechanism to solve a person’s issue that might otherwise lead to a statutory grievance.   He desired our input on whether or not it would work and what would make it work better.  Nothing in this draft denies anyone of their right to a grievance under the code.  This process says than when a person comes to the Human Resource Department and states they are going to tender a grievance at Level II, we will ask them if they would care to participate to an ADR process to try and settle their issue.  We would like to utilize this informal process as much as we can to settle issues.  Mr. Stephens requested feedback for improvement of this process.  First, Mr. Stephens will ask those persons coming in to file a grievance to do so that it is filed timely and then give us a waiver of the time line where we can work on the issue, talk with the parties to see if we can get a settlement.  If we think there is a really good constructive remedy that we are close to but we can’t perfect in 30 days, then we might go to the parties and see if they will give us another 15 working days or something to continue to work on it.  At each point the person filing the grievance has the option to say, no, that they want to have their hearing and they will continue in the statutory process.  

LuAnn South asked the question about what happens to the record of trying to solve the issue and Mr. Stephens stated it was something they would have to work out.   He suggested that we put some input on this issue. 

David Cremeans asked about the waiver of the time line, whereas, Mr. Stephens stated it must be in writing and signed and a hearing must be provided before the waiver is expired.  David states 3 or 4 have already used this process and they were resolved.  Mr. Stephens again asked for feedback. 

ACCE Representative – Stephanie Neal  read a portion of the WV Higher Education Policy Commission meeting of December 12, 2000 to Jim Stephens regarding Senate Bill 653 Enhancement Legislation which states: “….B.  Personnel, 2.  All other state employees are governed by the grievance procedure for state employees set out in W.Va. Code ~29-6A-1 et seq. while higher education employees are governed by the grievance procedure covering county board of education employees set out in W.Va. Code ~18B-29-1 et seq.  Higher education employees should utilize the same grievance procedure as other state employees.”  Mr. Stephens had not heard this emphasizing that processes are not entirely different but there is a time line and protocol for the two.    He can work with either. 

Stephanie further stated from this meeting there were quite a lot of questions regarding the suggested changes that the executive committee was recommending.  There was no resolution from the committee.  They only took the comments from the staff and audience.  The issues which are critical to classified staff are:  compensation and classification which they desire to take out of state code.  Concerns also over merit, retirement plans, - opt out of TIAA Cref, change the number of the Board of Governors meetings from 6 to 4, salaries based on peer equity with each institution having it’s own set of peers and the classified staff being removed from the peer equity issue but not faculty or administrators.   The salary schedule recommended is much lower than that of some of our peers, so their thinking is that is probably why they want us out of the peer equity group.  Stephanie Neal stated that Advisory Council is to meet with State Senator Lloyd Jackson but no date has been set.   

President Barrett stated that we need to follow closely this legislature session with letters, phone calls, E-mail as this is a critical session.  Issues are:  salary schedule – come July there is no provision for a raise and  PEIA.  Stephanie Neal further stated that we would not have the salary schedule we have now had not the classified staff been to the capitol to voice their opinions.   LuAnn South asked how the President of MU felt about the salary schedule.  President Barrett stated he is scheduled to be at our meeting January 18, 2001. 

Ken Reffeitt, Chairperson, Legislative Affairs:    Mr. Reffeitt stated if we go bifurcation, Plan B, then anyone can be hired for any position at any salary such as it was years ago.  For those who are bifurcated out, Stephanie Neal stated, as long as you are at the minimum equity set, then you are considered to be fair and equitable and there will be no provision for years of service for the exempt personnel.  Margaret Buttrick stated she misunderstood this statement and there would be years of service but if there was merit money, it would be in addition to years of service.  Example:  Someone works beside you for 4 years and you have been there 24 years, this 4-year employee can be paid more than you.  Ken stated as per President Barrett that the legislature could be our only source of influence.  Most people on the Policy Commission are new and not higher education orientated so, they are going to do what the Executive Committee says.  President Barrett emphasized to Stephanie and Ken that if they let us know what we should do, then classified staff will do it.  

Membership Election – Joe Wortham reported a meeting should be held in January 2001. 

Service Awards – Mr. Wortham reported they had their first meeting last week.  10-year awards for service were discussed and decisions will be forwarded to the president’s office for consideration. 

Jill Chapman made a motion, seconded by LuAnn South on the second reading of the constitutional revision of changing terms of office from two – 1-year terms to three – 1-year terms.  Council unanimously agreed.  This will take effective immediately. 

Since Jill Chapman is retiring, the office of Parliamentarian is open.  Jill Chapman nominated David Cremeans, seconded by Mohammad Chaudhry.  Charlene Hawkins made a motion, seconded by LuAnn South that the nominations be closed.  Council unanimously agreed.  David Cremeans is our new Parliamentarian. 

No further business, meeting was adjourned.