MARSHALL UNIVERSITY CLASSIFIED STAFF COUNCIL
MINUTES
Thursday, July 26, 2001
Stadium – Big Green Room
President Barrett called meeting
to order at 1:05 pm. Motion to accept minutes made by Lu Ann South,
seconded by Joe Wortham and approved by Staff Council.
INTRODUCTION OF NEW MEMBERS:
President Barrett announced that several new members were present for their first meeting and asked that everyone introduce themselves. She foresees our new year as a very busy one with much work to accomplish.
COMMITTEE
APPOINTMENTS:
President Barrett announced the
committee appointments as follows:
Financial
Affairs
-- Elizabeth
Graybeal
Legislative
Affairs
-- David
Cremeans
Membership/Election
-- Carla
Rae Cook
Personnel
-- Sonja
C. McKenna
Physical
Environment --
Betty Cook
Service
-- Bernice
Bullock
Staff
Development --
Muhammad Chaudhry
In accordance to the constitution, President Barrett submitted these names to Council for approval. Motion was made, seconded and approved.
FACULTY SENATE:
Athletic
Committee --
Jill Burcham
Budget
& Academic --
David Blackburn
Legislative
Affairs
-- David
Cremeans
Physical
Facilities --
Betty Cook
Student
Conduct & Welfare – Leah Tolliver
University
Functions --
Charlene Hawkins
Motion was made, seconded
and approved to accept these individuals as Faculty Senate Committee members.
The next two years the
ACCE members will be Stephanie
Neal/MU & Joe Taylor/MUGC and
the Institutional Board Of Governors
member will be Tanya Bobo.
NEW BUSINESS:
President Barrett advised that
after conversation that morning with Mike McGuffy her understanding of the
salary schedule was now back at square one.
President Barrett asks that Tanya Bobo and Stephanie Neal give overview
of recent meetings they had
attended.
Stephanie reported at the recent
Policy Commission meeting held June 29th guidelines were recommended
as follows in establishing the salary schedule. The Commission
recommended that all institutions
be required to establish a
multi-year salary policy to make even and significant progress toward the full
implementation of a new salary schedule; including movement of current employees
who are below the equity or 0 step on the salary schedule to the equity or 0
step.
Stephanie noted also that the
Advisory Council had recommended that an additional sentence be added
implementing this schedule be done within a four-year time frame. The policy
Commission rejected this
recommendation and made approval of the following: that a multi year salary
policy be established which gave the institutions total flexibility on time
frame. Stephanie also noted that whatever is decided will be reported fully at
the LOCEA meeting in November. Basically this means each institution in
the state will be funding the salary schedule at whatever time frame they deem
most appropriate which could be as much as 2-6 years and the money they have available for funding.
Tanya reported that the Board of Governors voted to approve a recommendation presented by Vice President Herb Karlet to partially fund the new salary schedule. The proposal would mean a percentage increase for all staff – classified and nonclassified, as well as faculty. The exact percentage was not released.
The proposal the Chancellor sent out after that made no provision for nonclassified staff or faculty and put almost all the monies available on the equity end of the new salary schedule. Meaning that new employees would benefit the most. It was not clear at that time whether or not the Chancellor planned to “mandate” his proposal, or if it indeed was just a suggested proposal for the administration to take under consideration.
Council members further discussed the issue that failing to have a formula in allocating raises would possibly bring repercussions due to employees filing grievances. The concern being if the Chancellor’s recommendation were followed, new employees would be greatly compensated and those employees with any length of longevity would receive very little if anything. Second concern was that all new employees coming on board after October would be hired in on the new the new scale which would place them very high on the salary schedule and above employees with longevity.
President Barrett advised
Council that a recommendation had to be submitted to the President by 9:00 am
Friday morning. Should Council vote
to go with the Chancellor’s
recommendation or the Governing Board? Joe
Wortham made a motion that we send President Angel the following from Staff
Council; “We recommend that Marshall University follow guidelines set forth by
our Board of Governors at their most recent meeting.
We feel the proposal by the Chancellor’s office would be grossly unfair
to current employees. It would
certainly benefit all new employees but those having any longevity would not
benefit.”
Stephanie suggested to President
Barrett that we stipulate in the
recommendation that we want the 4-year plan in place for the salary schedule.
Stephanie also advised that she would need a copy of this recommendation
to e-mail Amy Pitzer, Chair of the Advisory Council and this would also be
discussed at the upcoming council meeting.
The JEC has scheduled to meet
three days in September to start review of the Physical Plant Job family.
This is the first time JEC will be looking at the PIQ’s and this will
be a year long process. There is a
process ongoing at the present time to
clean up the all system wide titles
and Institution Specific titles by Human Resource administrators.
At some point all titles in the classification system
will become system wide instead of some
system wide and some institution specific.
Two items were brought to Stephanie’s attention with the first being salaries and the second Series 62. Question was raised if Series 62 was going to be revised or just certain parts of 62. Stephanie felt that a complete overview would be given to Series 62. Stephanie noted that both the Faculty Advisory and Advisory Council would be conducting meetings at this Retreat. A joint meeting of both Councils has been scheduled and staff council presidents have been invited to attend this meeting.
FREE FORUM
Lu Ann South reported to Council that her home had recently been
broken into and all medications stolen. Upon
contacting PEIA to see what she need to do for refills at her co-payment rate
she was told this was not permissible. The insurance company is not responsible
for any lost or stolen medications. The
financial responsibility belongs to the individual unless they want to appeal to
PEIA and obtain a waiver. On the
three 90 day quantity medications stolen, Lu Ann was able to obtain samples to
cover two. The last one, tamoxifin-a
cancer therapy drug-could not be obtained in samples as the manufacturer does
not dispense samples. Lu Ann then
contacted Felicia Joseph, pharmacist for PEIA and was given a waiver that
allowed her to get her prescription filled at the co-payment rate.
Longevity pay – question was
raised if taxes would be taken from this pay.
President Barrett noted the IRS is not going to give us anything but we
would not be taxed at the high rate of 28% and that we would be receiving this
on the 31st of July.
Sonja McKenna reported that she had been asked to serve
as Staff Council representative on a Flood Relief Committee and that Steve
Hensley is Chairman. She informed
Council that Marshall as a whole would be collecting any type of educational
supplies. The purpose for
this is to help those school systems throughout WV that had received so much
devastation from recent flooding. A
local trucking firm had agreed to transport all materials collected.
She hopes that we can gather supplies or conduct drives throughout our
offices. If anyone has
questions or ideas, please call or
contact her by e-mail.
Cora Westmoreland reported she had recently been contacted by the retirement board asking if she would like to switch back to the Teacher’s Retirement Plan and wondered if anyone else had been contacted. She had been advised that she would not lose any of the funds she has already built into her retirement. It was noted that this had been on the local news and that they are accepting only so many back into this plan.
With there being no further business meeting adjourned at 2:45 pm.