Explore the Title IX Process
The Title IX Office conducts prompt, fair, and impartial investigations of sexual misconduct, Title IX sexual harassment, sex‑based discrimination, and pregnancy or pregnancy‑related discrimination. Investigations and hearings avoid prejudgment of facts, conflicts of interest, and bias. The process begins with a presumption that the Respondent is not responsible unless responsibility is established by a preponderance of the evidence.
What are the steps in the Title IX Process?
Step 1: Intake & Assessment
When the Title IX Office receives a report, the Title IX Coordinator conducts an initial assessment and responds to any immediate safety or health concerns. This assessment may include:
- Assessing the Complainant’s well‑being and offering supportive measures.
- Informing the Complainant about medical care, evidence preservation, and safety planning.
- Explaining the option to contact—or decline to contact—law enforcement, and how to seek protective orders.
- Explaining University and community resources and how to request supportive measures.
- Explaining dismissal, Informal Resolution (when appropriate), and Formal Resolution, and discussing the Complainant’s preference.
- Explaining the prohibition against retaliation.
- Determining whether the report identifies parties and witnesses.
- Determining whether the parties are minors and whether child protective services must be contacted.
- Coordinating with MUPD and University officials to evaluate Clery Act obligations.
Step 2: Option for Resolution Is Determined and Followed
After the initial assessment, the Title IX Office determines which route to follow under the Title IX Procedures, based on:
- The Complainant’s wishes;
- Information gathered during intake;
- Whether the report meets Title IX jurisdiction;
- Whether the case should proceed as a Title IX, Non‑Title IX, or other University policy matter.
The possible outcomes are:
1. Dismissal
A case may be mandatory dismissed or discretionarily dismissed under the rules in 34 C.F.R. §106.45(b)(3); parties have the right to appeal a dismissal.
2. Informal Resolution
For cases eligible for Informal Resolution, and only with both parties’ voluntary, written consent, the matter may be resolved collaboratively with a trained facilitator at any time prior to a determination. Employee‑on‑student allegations cannot go through Informal Resolution.
3. Formal Resolution
If the matter proceeds formally, the University follows the required investigation, evidence review, live hearing with advisor‑conducted cross‑examination, written determination, and appeal procedures.
What are the different options for resolution?
Mandatory Dismissal (Title IX sexual harassment allegations)
The University must dismiss the Formal Title IX Complaint (with respect to the Title IX sexual harassment allegations), if any of the following are true—even if the allegations are assumed true:
- The alleged conduct would not constitute Title IX sexual harassment under the University’s Title IX policy and the federal definition in 34 C.F.R. §106.30.
- The alleged conduct did not occur in the University’s education program or activity.
- The alleged conduct did not occur against a person in the United States.
A mandatory dismissal for Title IX purposes does not preclude the University from moving the matter to another applicable policy or code (e.g., Non‑Title IX or Student Code of Conduct procedures).
Discretionary Dismissal
The University may dismiss the Formal Title IX Complaint, or any specific allegations therein, at any time during the investigation or hearing if:
- The Complainant requests in writing to withdraw the formal complaint or any allegations.
- The Respondent is no longer enrolled or employed by the University.
- Specific circumstances prevent the University from gathering sufficient evidence to reach a determination.
Notice of Dismissal & Next Steps
- The University will promptly send written notice of any mandatory or discretionary dismissal to both parties, including the reasons for the dismissal and information about the appeal process.
- Where appropriate, the Title IX Coordinator may refer the matter to another University office or procedure (e.g., Non‑Title IX procedures or Student/Employee Conduct).
Appeal of Dismissal
- Either party may appeal a dismissal on the grounds permitted by policy (e.g., procedural irregularity that affected the outcome, new evidence that was not reasonably available, or bias/conflict of interest).
- Appeals are decided by an Appeal Officer (or panel) who is not the investigator or the original decision‑maker. The Appeal Officer issues a written decision to both parties.
Supportive Measures & Recordkeeping
- Supportive measures remain available to either party regardless of dismissal or forum.
- The University maintains dismissal notices and related records for seven years in accordance with Title IX recordkeeping requirements
Informal Resolution (IR) is a voluntary, alternative process to resolve certain Title IX matters before a determination regarding responsibility is made. It is available only when both parties voluntarily agree to participate. Parties may request IR at any time prior to a determination in the case.
Eligibility and limits. The University does not offer Informal Resolution to resolve allegations that an employee sexually harassed a student. IR will never be required as a condition of enrollment, employment, or participation in any program or activity.
Notice and consent (required by federal regulations). Before IR begins, the Title IX Office will provide written notice describing: (1) the allegations; (2) the requirements of the IR process, including any circumstances under which IR would preclude resuming the formal grievance process; (3) that either party may withdraw from IR at any time before agreeing to a resolution and resume the formal process; and (4) the records that will be maintained or could be shared. Each party must then provide voluntary, written consent to participate in IR.
Process and outcome. If both parties agree to use IR, the Title IX Office will work with the parties to explore resolution options. Any agreed‑upon terms will be reduced to writing and signed by the parties. If either party chooses to withdraw from IR before signing a final agreement, the case returns to the formal grievance process.
Advisors and support. Parties may consult with and be accompanied by an advisor of their choice throughout IR. The Title IX Office remains available for supportive measures and referrals regardless of outcome.
Recordkeeping. The University maintains Informal Resolution records (including signed agreements) for seven years, consistent with Title IX recordkeeping requirements.
Formal Resolution addresses reports of Title IX sexual harassment and certain sex‑discrimination matters through a prompt, fair, and impartial process that includes investigation, a live hearing (for Title IX sexual harassment), a written determination, and appeal.
- Formal Complaint Filed
The process begins when a Formal Complaint is filed with the Title IX Office. - Notice of Investigation and Allegations
Parties receive written notice of the allegations and process; an Investigator is assigned. - Information‑Gathering (Investigation)
The Investigator interviews parties/witnesses and gathers evidence. Parties may submit statements, documents, and witness names. - Evidence Review (10‑day window)
Before a report is finalized, each party and advisor receives all directly related evidence for inspection/review and has at least 10 days to submit a written response. - Investigation Report (10‑day window)
The Investigator issues a report fairly summarizing relevant evidence. Each party receives the investigation report at least 10 days before any hearing or determination, with the opportunity to respond. - Dismissal Review
The Title IX Coordinator reviews whether the matter requires mandatory dismissal (e.g., alleged conduct would not constitute Title IX sexual harassment even if proven or is outside jurisdiction) or permissive dismissal (e.g., complainant withdraws), or whether it should proceed to a hearing. Parties receive notice and may appeal a dismissal. - Pre‑Hearing Conference (for Title IX sexual harassment)
A Hearing Officer/Panel (independent from the investigator) addresses logistics, witness lists, and decorum. Advisors conduct any cross‑examination at the hearing. - Live Hearing & Determination
For Title IX sexual harassment, a live hearing is required. The Decision‑Maker/Review Panel evaluates relevance, permits advisor‑conducted cross‑examination, and applies the preponderance of the evidence standard. A written determination (including findings, rationale, sanctions, if any, and remedies) is issued to both parties. - Appeal
Either party may appeal a dismissal or determination on the grounds permitted by policy (e.g., procedural irregularity, new evidence, bias/conflict). An Appeal Officer reviews submissions and issues a final decision.
Support Throughout. The Title IX Office remains available for supportive measures, resources, and questions for all parties throughout the process and regardless of outcome.
Anonymous Reports or When a Complainant Does Not Wish to Pursue an Investigation
The Title IX Office understands that some individuals may wish to remain anonymous or may not want an investigation or disciplinary action to occur. Under the 2020 Title IX regulations, the University must balance these requests with its legal obligation to respond promptly, effectively, and in a manner that is not deliberately indifferent once it has actual knowledge of conduct that may constitute sex discrimination or Title IX sexual harassment.
Below is how the University evaluates and responds to such requests.
Confidentiality and Anonymity
- Anonymity cannot be guaranteed when disciplinary or safety actions are taken. If the University must implement measures such as a No‑Contact Order, safety intervention, or disciplinary action, the Respondent must receive notice of the Complainant’s identity.
- Confidentiality is always respected to the extent possible, but it is not absolute. University officials may need to share limited information with personnel who have a legitimate need to know in order to respond appropriately.
- Anonymous or third‑party reports still trigger University response obligations. Under the 2020 regulations, schools must respond promptly, even to anonymous reports, if they have actual knowledge of alleged Title IX sexual harassment.
Impact on the University’s Ability to Respond
- The University may be limited in its response if the Complainant requests confidentiality or declines to participate. Without identifying information, the University may not be able to provide supportive measures or conduct certain aspects of an investigation.
- If a Complainant requests “no investigation,” the Title IX Coordinator must balance the Complainant’s preferences with the University’s responsibility to maintain a safe and nondiscriminatory environment for all.
- The Title IX Office may still move forward without Complainant participation when required for campus safety or when independent evidence suggests that the Respondent may pose a risk to the community. This is permitted under 34 C.F.R. §106.44, which requires a prompt and effective response even when a Complainant is unwilling to participate.
When the University May Proceed Without Complainant Participation
The University may decide to pursue a matter without the Complainant’s involvement when evidence exists beyond the Complainant’s account, such as:
- Available security camera recordings
- Corroborating witness statements or reports
- Physical evidence
- Admissions or statements suggesting responsibility by the Respondent
These factors help Title IX Coordinators determine whether moving forward is necessary to protect the campus community.
Limitations on Anonymous Formal Complaints
- A formal Title IX complaint cannot be anonymous, because federal regulations require the signed submission of a Complainant and mandate disclosure of identities in the Notice of Investigation and Allegations.
- However, individuals may report anonymously, and the University must still assess safety concerns, offer supportive measures when possible, and determine whether action is needed.
Support Remains Available Regardless of Participation
The Title IX Office remains available to provide:
- Supportive measures
- Referrals to resources
- Safety planning
- Guidance on reporting options
These services are available regardless of whether a Complainant chooses to participate in an investigation or resolution process.
Questions?
If you have questions about confidentiality, reporting options, or the Title IX Process, please review the Title IX Procedures or contact the Title IX Coordinator.
Marshall Title IX Procedures for Employees


